Re-TURBT Redefined: How Repeat Transurethral Resection Optimizes Management of High-Grade Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Nikhil Chauhan, Vipin Kumar
Author(s)
1Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, NCR Institute of Medical Sciences, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India. 2Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, NCR Institute of Medical Sciences, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract

Background: High-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (HG-NMIBC) has a strong tendency to recur early, often because some tumor is left behind after the first resection rather than because a new tumor has formed. Systematic reviews report residual disease in 33–53% of patients after an initial transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). This prospective study evaluated how useful a repeat TURBT (reTURBT) is in high-grade T1 NMIBC — how often it finds residual tumor, how often it changes the stage, and which factors predict this. Material and Methods: This prospective study was done at the NCR Institute of Medical Sciences, Meerut (May 2025–May 2026). Thirty adults with confirmed high-grade T1 NMIBC underwent reTURBT 4–6 weeks after their first resection. Group comparisons used the chi-square test. Because some subgroups were small, we also calculated exact 95% confidence intervals (Clopper-Pearson method) so small-sample estimates are not over-interpreted. Results: Residual or recurrent tumor was found in 56.7% of patients (17/30; 95% CI 37.4–74.5%). Rates were highest in anterior wall tumors (100%, 3/3), tumors ≥3 cm (80%, 4/5), and multiple tumors (63.6%, 7/11) — though the anterior wall and size subgroups had very few patients, so their confidence intervals are wide (29.2–100% and 28.4–99.5%) and should be read with caution. Upstaging from T1 to T2 occurred in 6.6% of cases (2/30; 95% CI 0.8–22.1%). Whether or not detrusor muscle was present in the first specimen made no clear difference to recurrence (58.3% vs. 55.6%). Conclusion: ReTURBT identifies clinically significant residual disease and staging changes in high-grade T1 NMIBC and supports the EAU/AUA recommendation for routine re-resection in high-risk cases. Some of our subgroup findings are based on very small numbers and need confirmation in larger studies. A selective approach may be reasonable for lower-risk patients.

Keywords: Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, Neoplasm Staging, Reoperation, Cystoscopy.

Outline