Comparison of Success & Complications Involved in Video Laryngoscopic, Bougie Guided Verses Preformed Endotracheal Tube Intubation

Gunda Soma Sharan, Aishwarya Sheetal Desai, Sheetal Desai, Rajendra Wamanrao Gaikwad
Author(s)
1Junior Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology, D.Y. Patil Medical College, Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India. 2Assistant professor, HBT Medical College and Dr. R. N. Copper Municipal General Hospital, Juhu, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. 3Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, D.Y. Patil Medical College, Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India. 4Associate Professor, Malti Medical College and Hospital, Murtijapur, Maharashtra, India.

Abstract

Background: Anticipated difficult airway management remains a major challenge in anesthetic practice. Video laryngoscopy has improved glottic visualization; however, successful endotracheal tube delivery remains difficult in many cases. Bougie-guided and preformed endotracheal tube techniques are commonly used adjuncts, but evidence comparing their effectiveness under video laryngoscopic guidance is limited. Material and Methods: This prospective interventional study was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesiology at Dr. D. Y. Patil Hospital and Research Centre over a period of two years. Sixty adult patients with anticipated difficult airways were randomly allocated into two groups: Group A underwent bougie-guided video laryngoscopic intubation, while Group B underwent preformed endotracheal tube-guided video laryngoscopic intubation (30 patients each). Primary outcomes included first-pass success rate, duration of intubation, and overall intubation success. Secondary outcomes included number of attempts, airway trauma, hemodynamic response, oxygen saturation, external laryngeal manipulation, and peri-intubation complications. Results: Baseline demographic and airway characteristics were comparable between groups. The bougie group demonstrated significantly shorter intubation time (37.77 ± 4.76 vs. 43.00 ± 4.02 seconds; p<0.001), higher first-pass success rate (90.0% vs. 63.3%; p=0.0184), fewer intubation attempts, greater rapid intubation success (<40 seconds; p<0.001), and higher overall intubation success (p=0.0326). Airway trauma occurred less frequently in the bougie group (2 vs. 7 patients). Post-intubation tachycardia was significantly lower with bougie-guided intubation (p=0.0284). Oxygen saturation and blood pressure responses were comparable between groups. Conclusion: Video laryngoscopic bougie-guided intubation is superior to preformed endotracheal tube intubation in anticipated difficult airway management, offering higher first-pass and overall success rates, shorter intubation times, fewer attempts, reduced airway trauma, and fewer complications. It represents a safer and more efficient technique for difficult airway management.

Keywords: Difficult airway, Video laryngoscopy, Bougie-guided intubation, Endotracheal tube, First-pass success, Airway trauma.

Outline