Comparative Study Between Radiological Outcome of Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study

Prasanna Biradar, Chaithanya Saradhi, Kshitij Sinha
Author(s)
1Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Kodagu Institute of Medical Sciences, Madikeri, Karnataka, India. 2Senior Resident, Department of Orthopaedics, PESIMSR, Kuppam, Andhra Pradesh, India. 3Senior Resident, Department of Orthopaedics, Jagannath Gupta Institute of Medical Sciences and Hospital, budge budge Kolkata, West Bengal, India

Abstract

Background: The objective is to compare the radiological outcomes of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty and conventional total knee arthroplasty at six months of follow-up. Material and Methods: This prospective comparative study was conducted at IMS and SUM Hospital Bhubaneswar, and included 38 patients aged 40–80 years undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty for end-stage osteoarthritis. Patients were allocated to conventional TKA (n = 21) or robotic-assisted TKA (n = 17). Radiological assessment was performed preoperatively, on postoperative day 2, at six weeks, and at six months. Results: All 38 patients underwent TKA for osteoarthritis. The conventional group included 12 females (57.1%), while the robotic-assisted group included 10 females (58.8%). The mean body mass index was 31.0 kg/m² in the conventional group and 32.05 kg/m² in the robotic-assisted group. The mean alpha angle improved from 93° preoperatively to 96° at postoperative day 2 and remained stable at six weeks and six months in both groups. The mean beta angle improved from 88° in the conventional group and 89° in the robotic-assisted group preoperatively to 90° in both groups postoperatively. The mean gamma angle was 5.5° in the conventional group and 6° in the robotic-assisted group, while the mean sigma angle was 86° in both groups throughout follow-up. All patients achieved acceptable alpha, beta, and gamma angles, while one sigma-angle outlier was observed. Conclusion: It is concluded that robotic-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty produced comparable early radiological outcomes at six months of follow-up. Both techniques achieved satisfactory coronal and sagittal component alignment, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups.

Keywords: Total knee arthroplasty, robotic-assisted TKA, conventional TKA, radiological outcome, component alignment, osteoarthritis.

Outline