Adverse Drug Reporting and Determinants of Under-reporting among Doctors of a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Survey on Knowledge, Attitude and Practice

D. Meher Sheena
Author(s)
1Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Gayatri Vidya Parishad Institute of Health Care and Medical Technology, Marikavalasa Village, Madhurawada, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India

Abstract

Background: Adverse drug reaction reporting is a core pharmacovigilance activity, yet spontaneous reporting systems remain limited by under-reporting among healthcare professionals. Understanding doctors' knowledge, attitude, practice, and perceived barriers is essential for strengthening institutional drug-safety systems. The objective is to assess knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding adverse drug reaction reporting among doctors of a tertiary care hospital and to identify determinants of under-reporting. Material and Methods: This hospital-based analytical cross-sectional survey was conducted among 150 doctors at Gayatri Vidya Parishad Institute of Healthcare and Medical Technology, Visakhapatnam, from March 01, 2026 to March 31, 2026. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire covering demographic characteristics, pharmacovigilance knowledge, attitude, reporting practice, and barriers. Descriptive statistics, Chi-square test, and multivariable logistic regression were used for analysis. Results: The mean age of participants was 31.8 ± 7.2 years, and males constituted 56.0%. Previous pharmacovigilance training was reported by 41.3%. Adequate knowledge was observed in 45.3%, whereas 80.7% showed a positive attitude. Although 72.0% had encountered suspected adverse drug reactions, only 32.7% had ever reported one. Among doctors who encountered adverse drug reactions, 67.6% had not reported them. Major reasons for under-reporting were uncertainty about causality, workload, lack of awareness about reporting procedure, non-availability of forms, and lack of training. Independent determinants of under-reporting were absence of pharmacovigilance training, unawareness of the nearest monitoring centre, workload, and uncertainty about causality. Conclusion: Doctors demonstrated favourable attitudes toward adverse drug reaction reporting, but reporting practice remained low. Regular training, simplified reporting pathways, visible reporting forms, and feedback-based institutional pharmacovigilance systems are required to reduce under-reporting.

Keywords: Adverse drug reaction; Pharmacovigilance; Under-reporting; Knowledge; Attitude; Practice; Doctors; Tertiary care hospital.


Outline