A Retrospective Study on Serologic Weak D Phenotype Among Rh-Negative Blood Donors Undergoing Indirect Antiglobulin Testing at a Tertiary Care Centre

Nikhat Anjum Sayyad, Shrutika Pawar, Jyoti Kasture, Preeti Bajaj
Author(s)
1Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik, Maharashtra, India.
2Junior Resident, Department of Pathology, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik, Maharashtra, India.
3Professor, Department of Pathology, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik, Maharashtra, India.
4Professor and Head, Department of Pathology, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik, Maharashtra, India.

Abstract

Background: The Rh blood group system is highly significant in transfusion medicine, with the D antigen being the most immunogenic. Weak D, formerly termed Du, represents a quantitative reduction in D antigen expression and may lead to alloimmunization if not correctly identified. Determining the prevalence of serologic weak D among Rh negative donors is essential to enhance transfusion safety. The aim is to determine the prevalence of serologic weak D phenotype among Rh negative blood donors at a tertiary care centre. Material and Methods: This retrospective study was conducted over a three-year period from 2022 to 2024 at a tertiary care blood centre. A total of 10,653 blood donations were recorded. Of these, 609 donors were found to be Rh negative. Weak D testing was performed using the indirect antiglobulin test method with monoclonal Anti D reagents. Agglutination after the addition of anti-human globulin was considered confirmatory for weak D positivity. Prevalence was calculated as a percentage of Rh negative donors. Results: Among the 10,653 donors, 609 (5.72 %) were Rh negative and 10,043 (94.28 %) were Rh positive. Of the 609 Rh negative donors, 18 were confirmed as weak D positive, yielding a prevalence of 2.96 %. Weak D positivity was found in all ABO blood groups and highest proportion was observed in A negative donor (5.52 %). Conclusion: The prevalence of serologic weak D among Rh negative donors in our centre was 2.96 %. Routine weak D testing in Rh negative donors is essential to prevent misclassification and reduce the risk of alloimmunization, thereby ensuring safer transfusion practices.

Keywords: Weak D; Rh-negative donors; Indirect antiglobulin test; Blood transfusion; Alloimmunization.

Outline